Why Smaller Fantasy Leagues are Fairer than Large Multi-Entry Contests
In the world of daily fantasy sports (DFS), one of the biggest debates centers around the fairness of small leagues versus large contests with multiple user entries. Major platforms like FanDuel allow users to submit dozens—or even hundreds—of entries in large contests, which might seem exciting but often skews the playing field. For the average player, smaller leagues of 50 to 100 users with single entries offer a fairer and more enjoyable experience.
The Problem with Multi-Entry Contests
On platforms like FanDuel, larger contests can have thousands of entries, with some users entering multiple lineups. While this increases the potential prize pool, it also drastically shifts the competitive landscape. In contests where players can submit 50, 100, or more lineups, users with more resources and advanced strategies gain an overwhelming advantage.
Multi-entry contests allow experienced players (known as "sharps") to spread out their picks across different lineups, covering more combinations and improving their chances of winning. This approach is often referred to as “portfolio-style” playing—a method similar to diversifying investments in the stock market. The result? Casual players who enter only one or two lineups are left competing against users who dominate with a high volume of entries.
Why Smaller Leagues are Fairer
In contrast, smaller leagues with 50 to 100 users and single-entry restrictions level the playing field. Here’s why:
Single-Entry Only: In these leagues, each player is limited to just one lineup. This forces every user to rely on their skill and knowledge of the sport, rather than sheer volume. Without the ability to hedge their bets with multiple lineups, even expert players must carefully choose their picks—just like the casual fan.
Balanced Competition: Smaller leagues reduce the influence of sharp bettors who rely on computer simulations or portfolio-style entries. With only one shot per user, the competition is more balanced, making it possible for any player to win, regardless of their level of expertise.
Increased Engagement: For many fans, the thrill of DFS comes from creating one perfect lineup and rooting for those players to perform. Smaller leagues enhance this experience by allowing everyone to focus on a single set of choices, without feeling outmatched by competitors with dozens of entries.
Why Multi-Entry Contests Can Be Frustrating
One of the most frustrating aspects of multi-entry contests is the sheer volume of entries submitted by sharp players. Imagine entering a contest with thousands of users, only to discover that a handful of players have submitted hundreds of lineups each. Even if you draft a solid lineup, the odds of winning are greatly diminished by those with more resources and analytical tools.
In fact, studies show that sharp players using multi-entry strategies win the majority of large DFS contests. While casual players might win here and there, the long-term advantages of the pros can feel insurmountable. This is why smaller leagues with single-entry limits provide a more enjoyable experience for everyday fans.
The Appeal of 50-to-100-User Leagues
Smaller leagues don’t just level the playing field—they also offer a more intimate and exciting DFS experience. In a league with 50 to 100 users, you know that everyone is working with the same opportunity: one entry, one chance to win. This makes every decision—from roster construction to player selection—feel more meaningful.
Furthermore, smaller leagues make it easier to track your competition. Rather than sifting through thousands of entries, you can keep an eye on your fellow competitors and strategize more effectively. The smaller pool of participants increases your chances of success without sacrificing the excitement of DFS.
SureShot Fantasy: Where Fairness is the Priority
SureShot Fantasy takes this concept of fairness to heart. In contrast to big DFS platforms like FanDuel, SureShot focuses on creating smaller leagues with single-entry limits, ensuring that every player has a fair chance to compete. Here’s why SureShot’s model is a game-changer for regular fans:
Lower Rake: SureShot takes only a 2% rake from contest entries, compared to the 15% typically seen on other platforms. This smaller cut means that more of the prize pool goes back to the players.
Balanced Gameplay: By focusing on smaller leagues with single-entry restrictions, SureShot fosters a more balanced and competitive environment. Players are rewarded for their skill and sports knowledge, not their ability to game the system with multiple lineups.
Fair for Everyone: Whether you’re a seasoned DFS player or a casual fan, SureShot’s format ensures that every contest is fair and fun. There’s no need to worry about competing against players who enter dozens of lineups; at SureShot, it’s all about one entry, one chance.
Conclusion: A Fairer DFS Experience Awaits
If you’re tired of the uneven playing field in large, multi-entry contests, smaller leagues with single-entry limits offer a refreshing change. By leveling the playing field and creating a more balanced competition, these smaller leagues make DFS more accessible and enjoyable for everyone.
SureShot Fantasy is taking this approach to heart by focusing on fairness and fun. With smaller leagues, lower rake, and single-entry limits, SureShot is creating a DFS experience where regular fans can compete and win without feeling overwhelmed by sharp players and their multiple lineups.
Join the SureShot waitlist today to experience a fairer way to play daily fantasy sports. You’ll receive $50 in your account when the platform launches, giving you a head start in a league where everyone has a fair shot.
